Sound Affects

what is this six-stringed instrument but an adolescent loom?

Annabel Crabb is on fire

with 8 comments

if there are those of you that are unlucky enough to have not been reading Annabel Crabb in the Sydney Morning Herald over the last 18 months or so, you are really missing out.

This woman has risen to be one of the most consistently clever, brilliant, intelligent, insightful and witty journalists at the SMH and in Australia.

Here is her latest article.


Guilty of grievous oratory harm

Annabel Crabb
May 31, 2008

‘Police are currently investigating the possible prosecution of offences regarding the act of publish indecent article under the Crimes Act”.

These are the exact words with which the NSW Police announced their intentions vis a vis Bill Henson, photographer, eight days ago.

A million more words will be expended on these events, of course.

But while we’re cooking up offences against respected citizens, why not turn the eyes of the law towards a grammatical crime committed with increasing regularity by uniformed officers?

Forget “publish indecent article” for a moment. What about “omit indefinite article”?

This offence, among others, has been stealthily on the rise among NSW’s finest for some time.

A quick glance at the NSW Police’s website reveals that the luckless Henson is by no means the only perp to have his collar felt on a grammatically absurd charge.

Only days earlier, a Lakemba man was charged with “disseminate child pornography” after a police raid on his market stall in Campsie.

“A man will face court after being charged over alleged break, enter and steal offences around Newcastle”, the cops announced on Wednesday, May 7.

Then it was the turn of a 46-year-old finance sector employee, who according to NSW Police on May 21, has been charged on 26 counts including “make false statement, make/use false instrument, and obtain benefit by deception”.

And just last week, the cops issued a press release advising that a 21-year-old Cartwright man and his 260 hydroponically-grown cannabis plants had been parted, after a brief but potentially lucrative cohabitative relationship.

“The man has been charged with cultivate larger than commercial quantity of a prohibited plant and bypassing the electricity meter”, the press release reported.

As you can see from the last example, the odd clause does escape the language mangler – clearly the work of some rogue conjugator deep within the public affairs department, who probably never gets invited anywhere.

But on the whole, copspeak is nothing more than a serious rap sheet of crimes against the English language. Why do our police have to sound like they learnt English from a mobile phone instruction pamphlet?

Is this a funding issue? Is it possible that our police force has been so starved of finances by the NSW Government that it can no longer afford the luxury of joining words?

If so, it’s a real cheek; you’d think this Government would be generous in funding its law enforcement officers, if for no other reason than that its own MPs seem to devote so much of their private lives to the creation of extra work for them.

Shame, Iemma, shame.

A closer look, however, suggests that the problem is more one of resource allocation. What the cops save on the regular omission of the indefinite article, they tend to splurge elsewhere.

If we examine the case of the Sydney man who has been done for “obtain benefit by deception”, for instance, we find that he was nabbed by an outfit called “Task Force Foamcrest”.

Sorry? Foamcrest?

It’s hard to see how NSW Police could possibly justify kitting itself out with all manner of fancy taskforce titles, when elsewhere there are officers forced to chop back whole sentences in a brutal austerity measure.

Many officers also are guilty of substituting expensive verbs where cheap ones would do.

How many times have you heard an officer declare that a murder or accident victim was “deceased at the scene”, when “dead” would probably cover it just as well?

The field of police communications is littered with offenders who “decamped in a westerly direction” instead of just running away, like anyone else would.

Or who “discharged their weapon intentionally into the vicinity of the victim”, rather than taking the cheaper and easier decision simply to shoot them.

And do you know the worst thing about this entire racket? It’s a conspiracy. Journalists cover it up all the time. You wouldn’t even know about most of the instances of “omit indefinite article”, because we in the fourth estate tidy everything up so you don’t find out.

When the Rose Bay commander, Superintendent Allan Sicard, outlined to the cameras on Friday last the clunky crimes with which Henson and his henchpersons were to be charged, a team of clean-up experts went to work straight away.

The ABC’s PM website now blandly records that Superintendent Sicard referred to the offence of “publishing an indecent article”.

The Independent newspaper in Britain was one of dozens who used the same sanitised version. Readers, this cancer runs deep. Everybody’s in on it. There isn’t much time – any minute now, I shall hear the tap on the door and it will be the troopers, come to bust me on 800 counts of “aggravated take piss”.

Written by soundaffects

May 31st, 2008 at 10:02 pm

8 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Really? I can’t stand the smug bitch.


    June 9th, 2008 at 7:00 pm

  2. Seriously?


    she’s so brilliantly funny…

    and smart, too. she wrote a book called Losing It: A History of the Labor Party in Opposition, and it was really terrific. Really in-depth, and confronting, and self-effacing. And written by someone who clearly sympathises with the ALP, but just got jack of seeing them be such dead-shits.

    It’s great


    June 9th, 2008 at 11:00 pm

  3. I can’t stand her either. I don’t find her funny at all and her analyses are very superficial. She responded to her continuing beat-up of the Fuel Watch issue by saying that the Goverment should easily be able to handle the beat-up of such a small event… Great journalism there.

    I don’t know what her articles are supposed to contribute, but acting like the court jester is certainly getting me to think of her as one.


    June 24th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

  4. Annabel Crabb is an out and out bitch.

    She is also an obvious Liberal supporter but tries oh so hard to use whatever she can to abstract that so it’s not too obvious for the sheeple.


    February 5th, 2009 at 6:40 pm

  5. Honours flowed to Joel Fitzgibbon, former auto-electrician
    Numbers man to Kevin Rudd,
    Once a sparky, now a dud

    Marcus Einfeld is not known for telling porkies on the phone
    But now his future’s fully fraught with whoppers that he’s told the court.

    Claude Rigney

    March 28th, 2009 at 12:17 pm

  6. Annabel Crabb is a massive loser. She is a bitch with down syndrome and obviously has Crabbs in her vagina (get it?).

    Because of how sadistic, how low and how stupid this female is, I might even have enough energy to create a website dedicated only to rebutting every one of her articles with mindless photoshop of penises floating around her face. But then I thought, I’d be just as shallow and stupid as her.

    Annabel Crabb needs a dick in her ear.


    June 14th, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    • I am not the Claude Rigney who wrote this disgusting rubbish. I am an admirer of Annabel Crabb’s work. As I am probably the only Claude Rigney in Australia, I suspect that my identity has been assumed by a nut case.
      Claude Rigney

      Claude Rigney 1 Essex St Epping

      September 1st, 2012 at 11:18 pm

  7. I really cant stand that woman. The 2009 Walkley Awards showed her incredibly snarly and smug she can really be.


    November 26th, 2009 at 11:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: